Government Regulating How Private Industries Organize Or...

In government businesses and agencies today, the architecture within their networks are rapidly changing and becoming more complex with new services, applications, servers, devices and connections. With the increase of vulnerabilities that can be exploited associated with the changes in the network architecture, data protection is a high priority. The government made the decision that private companies would build and own the key communication, transportation, and energy networks. Although, the networks are owned by the private sector, there is a need for the United States to protect their people from malicious attacks which include identify attack, cyber espionage and cyber acts of war. It is the government responsibility to protect the confidentially, availability, and integrity of all the data that relates to the U.S. and its people. In order to do this, the government believes they have to partake in ensuring the private sector networks are safe from unauthorized users. In this p aper, I will discuss the positives and negatives of the government regulating how private industries organize or improve their cybersecurity and how they justify it. The government has an obligation of ensuring that the national security is kept safe and that there are no security breaches. Cyber threats are the number one threat that the United States face today. Private industries have a huge role in the security of America. An attack against a private sector is an attack against the U.S. andShow MoreRelatedContemporary Issues in Management Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pagesin the academic world as falling relative salaries and status have reduced the intake of talented academic entrepreneurs. But I also think it reflects the cumulative impact of regulatory and careerist pressures in the academic world itself. With government agencies pressing for ever more standardized and conventional research and with increasingly instrumental careerist vi FOREWORD behaviour by academics, there are fewer incentives to bridge the academic and practical spheres. No doubt this